Flow Panelpoint
Restaurant group reporting, assembled for the managers who close the period.
From our Yan Nawa office we prepare multi-outlet packs for food service managers who need clear covers, food cost, and labour figures across their kitchens — without rebuilding the spreadsheet every month.
Period packs built around real kitchen calendars
Food service managers overseeing sister restaurants in Bangkok rarely lack numbers. They lack a group view that arrives on the same day the outlets close. Our flagship Multi-Outlet Group Reporting Engagement takes sales, purchases, and labour hours from each kitchen and returns a ranked pack ready for the manager briefing.
Related reporting work
Supporting reviews and briefings sit beside the group engagement when a menu reprint or regional meeting needs its own focus.
Multi-Outlet Group Reporting Engagement
A structured period engagement that assembles sales, food cost, and labour figures from each outlet into a clear group report for food service managers.
10–14 working days per period close
Menu Contribution Review
A focused review of dish-level contribution across a kitchen or concept, highlighting items that carry the period and those that dilute food margin.
5–7 working days
Outlet Comparison Briefing
A half-day briefing that places sister outlets side by side so regional managers can see where covers, ticket size, and food cost diverge.
Half day (about 3 hours) plus prep
Monthly Reporting Retainer
Recurring hands-on support that keeps your group report calendar moving each month without rebuilding the process from scratch.
Minimum three-month commitment
Briefings that keep sister outlets honest with each other
When regional managers sit with comparison charts, the conversation shifts from rumour to covers, ticket size, and food cost for the period just closed. See how our period-close rhythm works across Greater Bangkok.
Explore the period-close rhythmWhat managers say after the briefing
Evidence from recent restaurant group reporting work — specific outlets, menus, and constraints, not generic praise.
They rebuilt our five-outlet period pack so the food cost column finally matched what each kitchen actually purchased that month. The briefing ran long because we argued over one suburban outlet’s waste notes — useful argument, not fluff.Soraya Chaiyanan — Food service manager, multi-brand casual dining group
The menu contribution review caught two lunch sets that guests loved but barely covered ingredients after the coconut price jump. We delayed the reprint a week and adjusted those plates before the printer.Anan Phromthep — Kitchen lead, riverside Thai restaurant